<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New media menu, same taste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandhabits.net/2009/10/11/new-media-menu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandhabits.net/2009/10/11/new-media-menu/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandhabits</title>
		<link>http://brandhabits.net/2009/10/11/new-media-menu/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandhabits]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandhabits.net/?p=132#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Simon. I&#039;ll look forward to the &#039;more on that soon&#039;. Great point on the &#039;menu&#039;. If media agencies don&#039;t put all the additional channels on the menu they won&#039;t get out to the brand marketers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Simon. I&#8217;ll look forward to the &#8216;more on that soon&#8217;. Great point on the &#8216;menu&#8217;. If media agencies don&#8217;t put all the additional channels on the menu they won&#8217;t get out to the brand marketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eskimon</title>
		<link>http://brandhabits.net/2009/10/11/new-media-menu/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eskimon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandhabits.net/?p=132#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think your point on incentives is critical - the concept of rewarding agencies on performance is a vital step towards ensuring everyone is working towards a common goal. However, we face significant challenges in moving to such a model. 

The main reason for this is that most marketers still focus on the wrong measures. Until we recognise what advertising can and cannot do, we&#039;ll continue to see misguided recommendations and inaccurate interpretations of subsequent performance (much more on that in the &lt;a href=&#039;http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/measures-of-success/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;measures of success&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&#039;http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/advertising-and-sales/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;advertising and sales&lt;/a&gt; posts).

On a related note, it&#039;s important to re-stress a point from the &lt;a href=&#039;http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/media-myopia/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;media myopia&lt;/a&gt; post: the &#039;menu&#039; that many agencies continue to employ (consciously or otherwise) is a key barrier to improving brand communications. 

The graphic at the top of your post exemplifies the &lt;i&gt;limited&lt;/i&gt; thinking that characterises most media planning. A warped remuneration model means that many agencies restrict their recommendations to those media that will deliver sufficient returns to cover their costs. That&#039;s limiting the value they can deliver to clients. I understand the rationale - all businesses need to survive - but it&#039;s clear from this analysis that it&#039;s the remuneration model that should change, not the channel mix.

The reality is that absolutely &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt; can be &#039;media&#039;, and the best connections aren&#039;t always paid mass-media. More on that soon...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your point on incentives is critical &#8211; the concept of rewarding agencies on performance is a vital step towards ensuring everyone is working towards a common goal. However, we face significant challenges in moving to such a model. </p>
<p>The main reason for this is that most marketers still focus on the wrong measures. Until we recognise what advertising can and cannot do, we&#8217;ll continue to see misguided recommendations and inaccurate interpretations of subsequent performance (much more on that in the <a href='http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/measures-of-success/' rel="nofollow">measures of success</a> and <a href='http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/advertising-and-sales/' rel="nofollow">advertising and sales</a> posts).</p>
<p>On a related note, it&#8217;s important to re-stress a point from the <a href='http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/media-myopia/' rel="nofollow">media myopia</a> post: the &#8216;menu&#8217; that many agencies continue to employ (consciously or otherwise) is a key barrier to improving brand communications. </p>
<p>The graphic at the top of your post exemplifies the <i>limited</i> thinking that characterises most media planning. A warped remuneration model means that many agencies restrict their recommendations to those media that will deliver sufficient returns to cover their costs. That&#8217;s limiting the value they can deliver to clients. I understand the rationale &#8211; all businesses need to survive &#8211; but it&#8217;s clear from this analysis that it&#8217;s the remuneration model that should change, not the channel mix.</p>
<p>The reality is that absolutely <i>anything</i> can be &#8216;media&#8217;, and the best connections aren&#8217;t always paid mass-media. More on that soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

